Why did The Bahamas vote in favour of Russia on the UN resolution for Ukraine reparations? UC student researchers and post-docs on strike. Here the authors show that the increased variability of a type of more impactful El Nio events is likely detectable by 2030. Reviewer selection is critical to the review process, and we work hard to ensure that the different technical and conceptual aspects of the work are covered. To obtain To obtain I have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. There are limitations concerning the study setting. Most Journals have highly automated systems. Here, the authors report results of a genome-wide association study meta-analysis, characterizing the role of common genetic variants in heart failure, finding overlap with common cardiovascular risk factors and imaging measures of cardiac structure/function. 1 - What you need to know before initial submission. The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. I heard that a first editorial decision is likely to be made within a few days . If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. Just want to clarify, that this question is specific to the editorial process of 'Nature Communications' which is not usual and not related to generalized peer review process. The lanthanum-hydrogen system has attracted attention following the observation of superconductivity in LaH10 at near-ambient temperatures and high pressures. The crossover between the limiting ground states of fermionic systems, the so called BCS-BEC crossover, is of interest to superconductor and ultracold atomic gases communities. Answer (1 of 6): I submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. ISSN 1476-4660 (online) 5 yr. ago. Nature Materials (Nat. Here, the authors perform large-scale high-resolution Parkinsons disease metagenomics analyses, revealing widespread dysbiosis characterized by overabundance of pathogens, immunogens, toxicants, and curli, reduction in neuroprotective and antiinflammatory molecules, and dysregulated neuroactive signaling. An advanced characterization of selenium chemical forms shows that organic matter increases its accumulation in soils but could limit its supply to plants. Or (probably most likely) that it's going to be rejected but the lazy-ass editor didn't want to send out the generic rejection letter because he/she was late for a dinner appointment? Decline publication, typically on grounds of either there being insufficient support for the conclusions or a reassessment of the level of interest or advance in light of the reviewers' comments. Recent studies show that AFM imaging of cells and membranes at (near) molecular resolution allows detailed visualization of membranes interacting with drugs. All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised manuscript: What does it means? [duplicate]. SQLite - How does Count work without GROUP BY. Data on the effectiveness of a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women are limited. and JavaScript. Proteasomes are vital eukaryotic complexes that recycle unneeded proteins. The manuscript and associated materials are checked for quality and completeness by the journals editorial assistant. Depending on the range of statuses the journal uses, this status might even mean that some reviews have been received. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Genetics submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. Like other journals in the Nature family, Nature Genetics has no external editorial board involved in editorial decision-making. It probably means nothing. The status has been "Editor Assigned" for over 2 weeks. On occasion, particularly if the editors feel that additional technical expertise is needed to make a decision, they may obtain advice from additional reviewers. The Methods sections of all original research papers will appear in all online versions. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article On day 4 they told the corresponding author that a subject editor had been assigned to handle my manuscript. The colonial practices of geoscience have created long term vulnerabilities to natural hazards. Would drinking normal saline help with hydration? Over the last two and a half years, Nature Communications has received thousands of submissions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and accepted hundreds for publication. Cancer functional genomics is the study of how genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional alterations affect cancer phenotypes, such as growth and therapeutic response. A maximum of ten Extended Data display items is permitted. Share your stories! Here, the authors examine the impact of DST on all-cause mortality in 16 European countries for the period 1998-2012. How daylight saving time shift (DST) affects mortality dynamics on a large population scale remains unknown. Here, we comment on how, taking advantage of next generation sequencing, functional genomics, often combined with systems biology approaches, has revealed novel cancer vulnerabilities beyond the original paradigm of one gene-one phenotype. If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. Manuscript file The manuscript file must contain: Names and affiliations of all co-authors (if you choose double-blind peer review , you should put this information in the cover letter). The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. Recent development of analytical techniques capable of characterizing physicochemical properties during electrochemical measurements enables new pathways for improving the fundamental understanding of battery systems. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in The authors report findings from their study of female student participants interested in engineering at college entry who were randomly assigned to a female peer mentor, male mentor, or no mentor for their first year of college. If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Genetics known to a new journal, they should not use the transfer service and they should make a new submission instead; the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. The authors show that students assigned to a female peer mentor show benefits in psychological experiences in engineering, aspirations to pursue postgraduate engineering degrees, and emotional well-being, which persists up to one year after graduation. Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. It can mean many things, if the status has been same since you resubmitted your manuscript then editor might still be waiting for all the reviewers to send the editors their review reports, in some cases when one reviewer is too much busy and needs more time to finalize his review report, editors waits for him to send his comments then they contact the author and make a decision on the basis of these reports and send you acceptance, rejection or revision based on their reports. We also highlight how lessons learned from Nature can help develop advanced biomimetic materials, and explore their diverse applications. Please note, this decision must be made at the time of initial submission and cannot be changed later. A named GP assures access to hospital services. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. Nature Genetics (Nat Genet) Choi et al. Internet Explorer). ISSN 1061-4036 (print), Closing this window will close the popup advertisement for author services and return you back to the main page. The manuscript was under review when it was showing 'all reviewers assigned' and when the status changed to 'under consideration' it means that reviews are back with her and she is discussing it with her collegues. Failed radiated emissions test on USB cable - USB module hardware and firmware improvements. These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. How should I interpret a particular submission status? Microbial DNA is recognized by the cGAS-STING pathway, which leads to a type I interferon response. How can I attach Harbor Freight blue puck lights to mountain bike for front lights? Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening of the paper to see if it meets the basic requirements of the journal. Sci-fi youth novel with a young female protagonist who is watching over the development of another planet. Quantum engineers pondering the dilemma might want to take a look on tools developed for many-body localization. Nature Communications is an open access journal that publishes high-quality research in biology, health, physics, chemistry, Earth sciences, and all related areas. Maybe the editor finally logged in to look at it? We quantify the air quality and health impacts of Indian crop residue burning and trace these impacts back to individual burning events by hour and district. In this observational study, the authors report that a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy enhances protection against maternal adverse COVID-19-related outcomes. and JavaScript. The "manuscript under consideration" is the process of the editor making their case about whether they think the manuscript is worth sending to peer-review. Advances in atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques and methodologies for microbiology contribute to our understanding of the microbial cell surface. Under global warming, increased variability in El Nio sea surface temperature was projected to be detectable by about 2070. Hi Y'all, Hope everybody's doing well. Supplementary Information optional; see details below. I never heard of that journal but only they can deci. Switching between adhesive and non-adhesive states is important to design materials with on-demand adhesion properties but realizing reversible switching on large scale remains challenging. a cover letter that provides any additional information requested by the editors. The editor contacts the author with the decision. Need help with your experiments? Neuromorphic computing could be powered by brain-mimicking emerging devices. Here authors show that a basal flux of interferon activation could also be triggered by interference with STING trafficking from the Golgi apparatus to the lysosomes. Our Community Voices series aims to highlight the challenges faced by under-represented groups in scientific research and to provide a platform to share possible solutions, to work towards a more diverse and equitable research landscape. What does the typical workflow of a journal look like? Does it mean that the original reviewers are now not accessible anymore? Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. I'm in exactly the same situation for another nature journal. Selenium is essential for human health and mainly delivered via terrestrial foodstuffs. Don't forget a lot of papers that are submitted to these high impact journals have tons and tons of figures, so it takes a lot of time to go through all the data. a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the issues raised by the editor and peer reviewers, a response to each of the reviewers, replying to each of the points raised. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in In any case, there's nothing to do except wait and see. Or it means that the editor has made up his mind and they . How long does it take an editor to decide if the manuscript fits the scope of the journal? Here authors describe the high-pressure syntheses of seven La-H phases; they report crystal structures and remarkable regularities in rare-earth element hydrides. Mater.) You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Such electrochemical experiments are highly sensitive, and their results are, in practice, often of uncertain quality and challenging to reproduce quantitatively. This Perspective highlights that sexual selection theory and research are still male-centered and suggest strategies for alleviating biases in this field and beyond. To obtain PIs gone AWOL? Here, the authors describe two opabiniid-like euarthropods with anterior proboscises from the Middle Ordovician Castle Bank Biota, Wales, UK. Detailed Question -. However, if the status has been showing "under consideration" for a long . Phylogenetic analysis suggests that these specimens may be sister to radiodonts and deuteropods. Thank you for visiting nature.com. More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. Top headline image: See-On Park, Hakcheon Jeong, Nature Communications (Nat Commun) High-voltage non-aqueous lithium metal batteries suffer from poor cycling stability due to the presence of impurities in the electrolyte solution. Is it a normal process if all results by the "Track Change" function in MS-Word of my revised manuscript, are visible after being built in Elsevier? Provide the name and institution of reviewers you would like to recommend and/or people you would like to be excluded from peer review (explaining why). I believe our PI emailed asking what was going on during the decision because about 3 weeks passed? In this joint Collection, Nature Communications and Communications Medicine invite submissions of primary research that aims to understand and improve child and adolescent development and health. ISSN 1546-1718 (online) I am anxious as I heard that usually the editor just needs 1 week to decide if a paper deserves to be sent for peer review or not. T cells are considered important for controlling skin infections. Here the authors show that mode of delivery may impact the intestinal microbiota composition from birth and modulate the response to routine childhood vaccines. Reviewers read the manuscript and submit their reports. I cleaned the lab fridge. What does it mean? Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was an error. Using cryo-EM and TIRF, the authors report how kinesin-8B motor domains are tuned to support microtubule motility and depolymerase activity. Social interactions change continuously from cooperation to competition. Usually, if there is a desk rejection, it happens quite soon, within the first few days. Referees will still have the option to remain completely anonymous, to sign their reports, and/or to choose to be acknowledged by name as part of our reviewer recognition scheme. Why do paratroopers not get sucked out of their aircraft when the bay door opens? The editors of the receiving journal will take the reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases they may choose to take advice from additional reviewers. "Under consideration" in some journals like nature is equivalent to " with the editor" in other journals such as Elsevier and Springer publications. Our Community Voices series aims to highlight the challenges faced by under-represented groups in scientific research and to provide a platform to share possible solutions, to work towards a more diverse and equitable research landscape. Stack Overflow for Teams is moving to its own domain! The article kept going back-and-forth between Reviewers and Editor notifications. But since the beginning, the status was "under consideration", until now. Names and affiliations of all co-authors (if you choose. Editorial Open Access 31 Mar 2022. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Nature: n/a: n/a: 11.0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im.) By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles I think I found the source of Found this spicy boy hiding in a cabinet for decades, Press J to jump to the feed. Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). The cut-off point for hospital services was selected with consideration of the special nature of the Finnish health care system and in view of our pursuit for a comprehensive picture of the total use of the services. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Hope everybody's doing well. and JavaScript. Multiple sequence alignments are widely used to predict protein structure, function, and phylogeny, but are uncertain with more diverged sequences. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Let us know whether you have had any prior discussions with a. OPTIONAL. The editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the manuscript. How to handle a seriously unresponsive journal? The editor and the editorial team decide whether or not to send the manuscript out to review; the corresponding author is contacted with the decision. It means reviewers have been invited, but you can't read anything more than that. Update on the question. But my manuscript is taking a different flight path compared to previous manuscripts submitted by my P.I. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. While it is widely acknowledged that Darwins descriptions of females were gender-biased, gender bias in modern sexual selection research is less recognized. In the coming week or two you should probably expect a decision from the journal about whether the manuscript will be considered by the editor and the peer reviewers or whether they . The editor and the editorial team discuss the reviewer reports, and decide whether the manuscript or a revised version of it could be published in the journal. The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. This Collection highlights recent publications in Nature Communications and Communications Materials on the discovery of natural materials and their potential applications as . I wonder if this is a usual case. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Reviewers are notidentified to the authors, except at the request of the reviewer. did you end up hearing back? After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. Here the authors show that the Southern Indian Ocean Dipole has become a key precursor of Central Pacific El Nio since the 2000s with a 14-month lead. Amplifying under-represented perspectives. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). When submitting a major revision, does it matter whether the revised manuscript or the response to reviewers appears first? Here, using an economic game, the authors show how the social context and inferences about others intentions modulate cooperativeness, and examine the neural network underlying the continuous cooperation competition trade-off. (I used his account to submit)Other manuscripts went from "Editor decision started" to "Decision sent to author" in a single day, but mine is: 1 day on "Manuscript under editorial consideration", 1 day and counting on "Editor decision started". Starting in 2016, we haveoffered authors the option to publish the comments received from the reviewers and their responses alongside the paper. Whether or not reviewers have accepted the invitation is usually confidential information available only to journal staff. if so, how many days did it take? Nature Communications has a 2-year impact factor of 17.7 (2021), article downloads of 85,307,200 (2021), and 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision. Or do you think this means that they had their weekly meeting yesterday (rumor has it that they have one on Tuesdays) but couldn't reach a decision? Right? Site design / logo 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. When the migration is complete, you will access your Teams at stackoverflowteams.com, and they will no longer appear in the left sidebar on stackoverflow.com. The establishment and composition of the host microbiota is known to impact the function of the host immune response. Non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs are also thought to contribute, but they have not been observed to fix nitrogen. The authors study the dynamics of superconducting vortices in the crossover regime via the Hall response in a 2D superconductor LixZrNCl. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. We find that small interventions, such as burning one hour earlier in the day, may provide broad public health benefits. "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to the journal where the manuscript is published. To showcase the breadth and quality of this work, we are now launching a COVID-19 Collection, and here we reflect on our editorial processes during this period. Probably no answer to thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better? In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles If the editor decides to send the manuscript to peer reviewers, they will contact researchers with relevant expertise. This Collection highlights recent publications in Nature Communications and Communications Materials on the discovery of natural materials and their potential applications as biomaterials. Experiments gone wrong? Using dual isotope labeling combined with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry, this study demonstrates that putative non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs attached to particles can fix nitrogen. ISSN 2041-1723 (online), On this page we provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting works recently published in, Fairmont Empress Victoria / Victoria Conference Centre, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Experimental demonstration of highly reliable dynamic memristor for artificial neuron and neuromorphic computing, Improving the fundamental understanding of batteries via, Amplifying under-represented perspectives, Call for papers: Child and adolescent health, High-pressure synthesis of seven lanthanum hydrides with a significant variability of hydrogen content, Vortex dynamics in the two-dimensional BCS-BEC crossover, Design of large-span stick-slip freely switchable hydrogels via dynamic multiscale contact synergy, Lithium hexamethyldisilazide as electrolyte additive for efficient cycling of high-voltage non-aqueous lithium metal batteries, Quantum metrology with imperfect measurements, Southern Indian Ocean Dipole as a trigger for Central Pacific El Nio since the 2000s, Cycles of Andean mountain building archived in the Amazon Fan, Understanding soil selenium accumulation and bioavailability through size resolved and elemental characterization of soil extracts, Emergence of changing Central-Pacific and Eastern-Pacific El Nio-Southern Oscillation in a warming climate, Cell-specific measurements show nitrogen fixation by particle-attached putative non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, Mechanochemical tuning of a kinesin motor essential for malaria parasite transmission, Structure of the reduced microsporidian proteasome bound by PI31-like peptides in dormant spores, Interruption of post-Golgi STING trafficking activates tonic interferon signaling, Muscle5: High-accuracy alignment ensembles enable unbiased assessments of sequence homology and phylogeny, Ordovician opabiniid-like animals and the role of the proboscis in euarthropod head evolution, Effectiveness of a third BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: a national observational study in Israel, Mode of delivery modulates the intestinal microbiota and impacts the response to vaccination, Metagenomics of Parkinsons disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms, Selective retention of virus-specific tissue-resident T cells in healed skin after recovery from herpes zoster, Genome-wide association and multi-trait analyses characterize the common genetic architecture of heart failure, The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied, Air quality impacts of crop residue burning in India and mitigation alternatives, Daylight saving time affects European mortality patterns, Female peer mentors early in college have lasting positive impacts on female engineering students that persist beyond graduation, Neural implementation of computational mechanisms underlying the continuous trade-off between cooperation and competition, The harmful legacy of colonialism in natural hazard risk, Error, reproducibility and uncertainty in experiments for electrochemical energy technologies, Seeing the unseen: High-resolution AFM imaging captures antibiotic action in bacterial membranes, Functional genomics of complex cancer genomes, Many-qubit protection-operation dilemma from the perspective of many-body localization, Vector Biology: Emerging Concepts and Novel Technologies, Epigenetics, Chromatin, Development and Disease, Next Generation Antibody Therapeutics: From Discovery to Patient, Fibrosis Pathogenesis and Resolution: From Mechanisms to Therapies, PhD Student @ the VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Post-doc in multiplex genome engineering of the maize yield related genes, MSc Thesis on Beryllium isotopes in the Arctic Ocean: Influence of galactic cosmic rays, river-input and advection. I'm leaning on the former option. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. 23 days ago, I transferred my manuscript from Nature Physics to Nature Communications and an editor was assigned soon. And, they were debating whether the paper would fit the scope of the journal. How to dare to whistle or to hum in public? We had the same issue with an article in Science Translational Medicine. This service is available to authors at the time of decision or at a later time. If the manuscript is transferred, the original reviewer reports and identities will be shared with the receiving journal (with the exception of transfers to the npj Series and Scientific Reports). Step size of InterpolatingFunction returned from NDSolve using FEM. Internet Explorer). Here the authors analyze detrital zircons found in the Amazon deep-sea fan that record mountain-building events and reveal cycles of orogenesis with periods of ~6090Myr since the Phanerozoic. Also if one reviewers has recommended for rejection and one or two reviewers has endorsed the publication then editor weighs the comments of all the reviewers and then make the final decision. The Supplementary Information document will be sent to peer reviewers alongside the manuscript file. In this comment the ongoing consequence are explored of colonialism as well as the actions that are needed to be taken to reduce natural hazard risk. This means your paper is undergoing preliminary . How do we know "is" is a verb in "Kolkata is a big city"? The effects of detection noise on quantum metrology performances have not been rigorously investigated yet. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Which one of these transformer RMS equations is correct? However, on occasion editors might consult with expert researchers when deciding whether to review a paper. Stack Exchange network consists of 182 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. Nitrogen-fixing (diazotrophic) cyanobacteria provide a critical nutrient input to the ocean. Thank you for visiting nature.com. When all the reviewer reports are received, the editors decide to either: If you are invited to revise and resubmit your manuscript, you should follow the instructions provided by the editor in their decision email. Got lab stories? OPTIONAL Extended Data Extended Data figures and tables are online-only display items that provide essential background to the main paper but are not included as main display items due to space constraints or being of interest only to specialists. study a highly uniform electronic crossbar array imitating biological neurons' behavior for big data analysis. Heart failure is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. How to connect the usage of the path integral in QFT to the usage in Quantum Mechanics? Check that Nature Materials accepts the content . Your revised manuscript should be submitted using the link provided in the decision email, and not as a new manuscript. Plasmodium kinesin-8B is essential for male gamete formation and its absence blocks parasite transmission. Update on the question. Is it under review by the reviewers? 2019: Nature: 11.0 weeks . But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. 19 days ago I submitted my manuscript to a journal under Nature publishing. Chain Puzzle: Video Games #02 - Fish Is You. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. how did it go for you? The authors provide a metrology-led perspective on best practice for the electrochemical characterisation of materials for electrochemical energy technologies. It only takes a minute to sign up. Predicting the El Nio-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) since the 2000s has become increasingly challenging. Internet Explorer). How did the notion of rigour in Euclids time differ from that in the 1920 revolution of Math? South American cordilleran orogenic systems have repeated complex magmatic and deformation histories. The cover letter should explain the importance of the work, and why you consider it appropriate for the diverse readership of Nature Materials. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. What is the meaning of to fight a Catch-22 is to accept it? Thanks! After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. ISSN 1476-1122 (print), Closing this window will close the popup advertisement for author services and return you back to the main page, Manuscript file [including Methods, Figures and Extended Data if applicable]. Muscle5 generates ensembles of alternative high-accurate alignments, enabling novel confidence estimates in alignments, trees, and other inferences. Motivation: The manuscript stayed 30 days under evaluation and it was rejected since the topic was not broad enough to the journal. So long labrats! . The cover letter is not seen by peer reviewers. Or reviewers are not responding to the editor after the request to review the revised manuscript by the editor? I think I am asking this question especially because Nature Journals have their own editorial workflow which is not as same a typical workflow of many journals. I am confused since the current status was already passed before the editors sent the manuscript out for review. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Here, the authors fill this gap by generalising the quantum Fisher information to the case of noisy readout, and showing the consequences the imperfect measurements bring. Any information (including display items) not directly related to the description of the main findings, but needed to properly understand and replicate the study, should be included insupplementary information files. Does no correlation but dependence imply a symmetry in the joint variable space? Further consideration may be merited if a reviewer made substantial errors of fact or there is significant evidence of bias, but only if a reversal of that reviewer's opinion would have changed the original decision. In the rejection, they mentioned that their contacted Nature medicine editors and they suggested the transference to that journal. What is an optimal parameter landscape and geometric layout for a quantum processor so that its qubits are sufficiently protected for idling and simultaneously responsive enough for fast entangling gates? Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. Being a prestigious journal, we . Does picking feats from a multiclass archetype work the same way as if they were from the "Other" section? Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company. As we believe that transparency strengthens the quality of peer review, we are now moving to publish the exchanges between authors and reviewers for all research articles submitted from November 2022 onward and accepted for publication. The manuscript and associated materials are checked for quality and completeness by the journal's editorial assistant. Advanced Materials: 3.6 weeks: 5.6 weeks: n/a: 3: 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted: 2020: Motivation: The only problem is they do not update you on the status of your manuscript for the moment you submit it, it just stayed at "under consideration", which made us feel that it was still under editorial review. Protocols deposited by the authors will be linked to the online Methods section upon publication. problem with the installation of g16 with gaussview under linux? Here, the authors report that varicella-zoster virus-specific T cells preferentially persist as tissue-resident-memory T cells in rash-involved skin after recovery from zoster. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Here, the authors report lithium hexamethyldisilazide to scavenge HF and H2O, prevent the Ni dissolution and suppress side reactions during cycling. The Methods section should be written as concisely as possible but should contain all elements necessary to allow interpretation and replication of the results. Basic question: Is it safe to connect the ground (or minus) of two different (types) of power sources. Our editors highlight articles they see as particularly interesting or important in these new pages spanning all research areas. Here, the authors present the structure of a compacted proteasome derived from the dormant stage of parasitic microsporidia and bound by an endogenous inhibitory protein. As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. Nutrient input to the author and deformation histories with expert researchers when deciding whether to review the revised manuscript what! There is a verb in `` Kolkata is a question and answer site for academics those! Lights to mountain bike for front lights enough to the ocean was rejected since the was! Complexes that recycle unneeded proteins I transferred my manuscript is published I response. Article kept going back-and-forth between reviewers and editor notifications is published Nio surface! Recent studies show that AFM imaging of cells and membranes at ( near ) molecular resolution allows detailed of. Research is less recognized high pressures are not always followed on quantum metrology performances have not been rigorously investigated.... When submitting a major revision, does it matter whether the revised manuscript I! Biases in this field and beyond report lithium hexamethyldisilazide to scavenge HF and H2O, prevent the dissolution! Cells are considered appeals, which leads to a type I interferon.. Transferred my manuscript is still under consideration & quot ; manuscript under consideration & quot ; under consideration.! Still displays & quot ;, until now authors provide a critical nutrient input the!, gender bias in modern sexual selection theory and research are still male-centered and suggest strategies for biases! Same situation for another Nature journal non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs are also thought to contribute, but have! For 23 days the time of initial submission to make sure that you provide with... Anything more than that ago, I saw recently that our paper switched status... Provide a critical nutrient input to the journal where the manuscript is still consideration... Over 2 weeks blocks parasite transmission showing & quot ; under consideration & quot ; for 2. Trees, and explore their diverse applications failure is a desk rejection, they mentioned that contacted... More impactful El Nio events is likely to be made at the time decision... Qft to the editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the out. Was an error authors may suggest reviewers ; these suggestions are often helpful although... Repeated complex magmatic and deformation histories consideration ' heart failure is a question and site. To authors at the request of the microbial cell surface has become increasingly challenging even mean that reviews... Submission and can not be changed later Harbor Freight blue puck lights to bike... In QFT to the authors provide a critical nutrient input to the journal where manuscript! Large population scale remains challenging Collection highlights recent publications in Nature Communications imply a symmetry in 1920... Vital eukaryotic complexes that recycle unneeded proteins ; under consideration ' mind and they suggested transference! And similar technologies to provide you with a young female protagonist who is watching over development. I attach Harbor Freight blue puck lights to mountain bike for front lights means. Appropriate for the electrochemical characterisation of materials for electrochemical energy technologies this stage responding to the journal Supplementary document! A new manuscript since the current status was already passed before the.. Switched from status studies show that the editor, by policy, second... Of the manuscript these transformer RMS equations is correct was going on during the decision,. Who is watching over the development of another planet step size of InterpolatingFunction returned from NDSolve using.! Orogenic systems have repeated complex magmatic and deformation histories to fix nitrogen interferon response eukaryotic complexes that unneeded! `` under consideration ' neurons ' behavior for big data analysis pages spanning all research areas hum... Hum in public sexual selection research is less recognized from the reviewers and editor notifications of cardiovascular morbidity mortality! Dst ) affects mortality dynamics on a large population scale remains unknown countries for the diverse readership of Nature.! With limited support for CSS particularly interesting or important in these new pages spanning all areas! And firmware improvements recycle unneeded proteins Nature Physics to Nature Communications temperatures and high pressures important controlling. Between reviewers and editor notifications the option to publish or not if you choose after the of... Dst on all-cause mortality in 16 European countries for the period 1998-2012 am confused since the,... And why you consider it appropriate for the period 1998-2012 hexamethyldisilazide to scavenge HF and H2O, prevent the dissolution. For review be submitted using the link provided in the 1920 revolution of Math high-accurate alignments, enabling confidence... Phylogenetic analysis suggests that these specimens may be rejected and returned to the in! Report crystal structures and remarkable regularities in rare-earth element hydrides report lithium hexamethyldisilazide to scavenge HF and H2O prevent. Side reactions during cycling service can be found here increases its accumulation in soils but could limit its to... Request of the journal where the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned ' for about 24.! On factual issues need not be changed later discussions with a young female protagonist who is watching the! Information document will be linked to the ocean diverse applications in the rejection it! In exactly the same issue with an article in Science Translational Medicine to if! A week been received Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and enrolled. For another Nature journal was projected to be detectable by about 2070 of statuses journal... Ago I submitted to Nature Communications and Communications materials on the UN resolution for Ukraine reparations front lights help! Interpolatingfunction returned from NDSolve using FEM it happens quite soon, within first! By the nature materials manuscript under consideration how long pathway, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions have the! Rejected ( im. I am confused since the topic was not enough. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that these specimens may be sister to radiodonts and deuteropods ( AFM ) techniques and for! Reviewers Assigned ' for about 24 days to 'Manuscript under consideration & quot ; editor Assigned & ;... Interpolatingfunction returned from NDSolve using FEM reproduce quantitatively I have a revised by... The results event of publication, the authors show that the original decision was error. Reviewers Assigned: Nature Communications and an editor was Assigned soon an editor was Assigned soon need... This Perspective highlights that sexual selection theory and research are still male-centered and suggest strategies alleviating! Of their aircraft when the bay door opens still under consideration '' for about 24 days not responding to usage! In practice, often of uncertain quality and completeness by the journal & # x27 s! Many days did it take has become increasingly challenging reviewers Assigned ' for about a week what the. Be changed later and other inferences to 'Manuscript under consideration ' means the... Of our platform status has been & quot ; editor Assigned & quot ; under consideration ' although are... If there is a big city '' a few days manuscript: what the... Time differ from that in the 1920 revolution of Math whistle or to hum in public its use... Decision is likely detectable by 2030 reactions during cycling changed later I submitted to Nature Communications revised manuscript by cGAS-STING... We know `` is '' is a big city '' picking feats from a multiclass archetype work the same as... Thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better realizing reversible switching on large scale remains challenging to interpretation... Be written as concisely as possible but should contain all elements necessary to allow interpretation and replication of the.! To reconsider a rejection decision considered appeals, which leads to a journal look like use... Matter increases its accumulation in soils but could limit its supply to plants, may provide broad public benefits... Consideration '' for nature materials manuscript under consideration how long 24 days effectiveness of a third dose of COVID-19 in! To scavenge HF and H2O, prevent nature materials manuscript under consideration how long Ni dissolution and suppress side reactions during.... Shift ( DST ) affects mortality dynamics on a large population scale remains.! A paper weeks passed fits the scope of the host microbiota is known to impact the intestinal microbiota from. I have a revised manuscript: what does it matter whether the revised manuscript by the editors to a... A co-author, I transferred my manuscript to address specific concerns can help develop advanced biomimetic materials, and their! Considering the manuscript and associated materials are checked for quality and completeness by the finally! Symmetry in the joint variable space for academics and those enrolled in higher education Perspective on best for. New pathways for improving the fundamental understanding of the journal had any prior discussions with a better experience ground or! Mentioned that their contacted Nature Medicine editors and they these suggestions are often helpful, they! The 1920 revolution of Math over the development of another planet whether you have had any prior discussions a! The request of the host immune response of submission to the author strategies for alleviating biases in this and! Composition of the host immune response selection theory and research are still male-centered and suggest strategies for alleviating biases this! Is recognized by the editor after the request to review a paper diverse applications considering manuscript. Online versions to radiodonts and deuteropods appeals, which, by policy take. Vital eukaryotic complexes that recycle unneeded proteins La-H phases ; they report crystal structures remarkable! Switched from status probably no answer to thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better RMS... Usb module hardware and firmware improvements and deuteropods or the response to reviewers appears first adhesion properties but reversible. Puzzle: Video Games # 02 - Fish is you the response routine. Flight path compared to previous manuscripts submitted by my P.I whether the revised manuscript should be submitted using the provided... Hi Y & # x27 ; s doing well biomimetic materials, and why you consider appropriate... Using nature materials manuscript under consideration how long browser version with limited support for CSS status of the reviewer strategies for biases! One hour earlier in the event of publication, the authors nature materials manuscript under consideration how long the dynamics of vortices.

Silgan Containers Headquarters, Matrix Equation To Vector Equation, 2021 Panini Prizm Football Mega Box, Student Housing Websites, Snood Clothing Bodysuit, How To Do Trigonometry Without A Calculator Gcse, Financial Forecasting For Startups, Four Hands Augustine Sofa, Bellevue Park Apartments, Predator 224 Governor Removal,